Showing posts with label copyright 101. Show all posts
Showing posts with label copyright 101. Show all posts

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Intellectual Property 101: Ownership Rights-Customs, "OoaK" Pieces and Exclusivity

Howdy gang!  I haven't been here to talk about intellectual property (copyrights, etc.) for a while, so I guess it's about time to talk about what rights, if any, a customer has to keep a design/item exclusive.  That is, can they expect an artist not to make the same piece again. I spoke to these issues a little in my "Can I Use That Image?" and "You Stole My Idea! ... or did you?" posts, but the subject has come up several times in recent weeks on a few of the social media forums I frequent, so I thought some clarification was in order.

Let me take a moment to remind you all that I am not a lawyer.  I worked as an intellectual property analyst and licensing contract writer/negotiator for years, so I know just enough information to be dangerous.  This post does not provide all possible details or exceptions and DOES NOT constitute legal advice.  If you need advice, CONTACT A QUALIFIED ATTORNEY.  



Exclusivity Rights.  In short, customers are not entitled to an expectation of exclusivity when they purchase a handmade item or piece of artwork.  The exception* would be if the customer had a written contract from the owner of the intellectual property rights and the creator of the item (might not be the same person/entity) stating that the design, image, specific item, combination of materials, etc. would never be created or sold again.  It is generally unrealistic to expect most artists to agree to exclusivity, since licensing and viral marketing can be our bread and butter.  However, for those who think they can get this agreement from an artist, be sure to make your request before you pay and work begins.


"But what about..."

Custom creations.  A customer does not have the right to limit reproductions (prints, etc.) or recreations of  a custom item.  Even if a client gives an artist "the idea," the resulting work/design/image belongs to the artist. A potential client once asked me to paint a specific animal in my Skelekitty & Friends style, and then referred to the custom order as a "collaboration."   Since he did not pursue the order for other reasons, the issue was never discussed between us, but it can be important to make sure clients understand a bit about the rights retained by an artist (easy to do with an image/design rights notice on order sites and on a note with the delivery).   

example of my copyright notice, enclosed with all prints

A few weeks back, an artisan publicly posted on a public forum that they had "obtained permission from the client" to reproduce one of his own creations.  I immediately saw this statement as a dangerous reinforcement of the erroneous belief so many customers have: the belief that they own the image/idea when they purchase an item.  After speaking with the artist about intellectual property rights, I learned that he didn't "get permission" from the client as much as he asked them if they'd mind if he made more.  (He typically made one of each project, but reproductions of this item were in high demand after it was posted it online.)  So while the artist didn't technically have to ask the client if they thought it was OK for him to make more, it was definitely a good business move since communication like this develops and preserves existing and future relationships. (It's the kind of relationship building Weird Al does when he asks for permission to use a song before he does a parody, even though he doesn't legally need to do so, much to the chagrin of Coolio.  He asks because he respects the feelings of the original musician, not because the law requires it.)


Items marketed as "one of a kind."  Does "one of a kind" count as a written guarantee from the creator that nobody will ever have a similar item?  Nope.  Even if an item was marketed as limited or one of a kind, the artisan is not guaranteeing that they will not make a substantially similar item in the future.  I know, I hear some of you out there saying "but it said ONE of a kind!  That means it will never be made again!"  Not really.  Why?    It's nearly impossible to mass produce identical products by hand.  The very nature of handmade items makes each piece, even if they're all identical in design, one of a kind. 

How about I give you some concrete examples while I tell you about some super awesome art my friends make?

Let's say we have a ceramicist who makes, oh, let's say, zombie pie birds (which are so awesome that I have two of them!)  Many of these pie vents are made using the same design and glazes, but because they are all individually hand made -no molds- they are in fact each one of a kind.
Every pie bird in this family is one of a kind!

Similarly, I have a friend who makes bottles with etched skulls on them.  However, because she draws and cuts every single-use stencil by hand, each bottle is considered one of a kind - even though she might make 10 or even 100 of them.

Each hand-etched bottle by KitCameo is different because
her hand-drawn and cut stencils are used one time only
So let's move away from the whole idea of legal rights and limiting factors and talk about why you want to buy custom work if a few people might end up with an item like yours.
  • You are getting exactly what you want by ordering a custom, handmade item.  You never have to settle and the possibilities are endless.
  • Artisans take their craft very seriously and these items are made with love and are of very high quality (yes, there are 'bad sellers' out there, so do some research but keep in mind that even the best sellers may have one or two irrationally angry buyers floating around).
  • You learn about the creative element as it happens, and often get a chance to give input as your item as it is being created.  That's just cool.
  • Compliments!  People are really becoming interested in buying handmade and custom art and items draw attention to you.  Plus: you get to help out an artist by spreading the good word!
  • Bragging rights: you can brag that you were the first person to ask for this item/request this custom or that it's your dog someone painted, etc., etc., etc..  People dig your style!
and mostly
  • Because, assuming being an individual is so important to you that you demand a completely unique item, only one or two people in hundreds of millions might have something kinda sorta like yours.  And why would you want to damage a business you are supposed to be supporting?  That's what you are doing by asking some of them never to sell 'your' awesome item again.

Thanks for reading.  I hope this helps to clarify some more of the fuzzy areas of intellectual property that affect the handmade community and our clients.  I'll continue to write these articles as I see problems, disagreements and confusion around teh interwebz.


===============================================================
* as usual, I am not taking "work for hire" into consideration.  If you want to know every possible nuance surrounding these subjects, I suggest you consult an intellectual property attorney, or perhaps consider applying to law school yourself.
Read more ...

Monday, April 11, 2011

FAQ: You Stole My Idea! ... or did you? (aka Copyright 101)

As I mentioned in my last post on Copyright 101, I have just enough knowledge on the subject to be dangerous.  I am not a lawyer, but an artist who was a contract negotiator and legal analyst in a former life (and who actually enjoys the subject of intellectual property).  Go figure.  While the last entry focused on the artist's rights to protect their creations (in that case, images of paintings), this entry comes at the subject from a different angle - what you cannot claim is your protected intellectual property.


"Welcome Home" (2007) art quilt by Krissi Sandvik
featuring Skelekitty© character created in 2006
ART & IMAGES

Every now and then I get e-mails from fans or friends who are concerned that my character, Skelekitty, may have been used without permission when they see skeleton animals with a similar "vibe" on the internet or in shops.

I always take their concerns seriously since two of my colleagues, Art by Suzi Boneshaker and Queenie of Pocket Full of Posiez (both of whom I adore as artists and as women) had their copies of their art reproduced by a large corporation without permission (*ahem* "stolen").  Luckily, when the blatant copyright infringement was brought the the company's legal department, sale and production of the stolen images ceased.  Not everyone is so lucky, especially when dealing with overseas entities or smaller companies.  So this is no laughing matter, especially now when images are so easy to "borrow" off of the internet.

"Kit" ©Skelanimals, LLC
I have been fortunate so far, since the images that raised concern with my friends have been primarily from the Skelanimals line and not someone actually reproducing Skelekitty illegally.  However, people see a "skele - kitty" and think my idea has been swiped, but here's the thing:


the very idea of a 'cute skeleton animal' is not subject to copyright protection

Let's look at how the Skelekitty / Skelanimals "Kit" designs differ: Skelekitty is a less stylized (more realistic) skeleton than the Skelanimals "Kit" character.  Kit and her Skelanimal pals are rounder, shorter and have just a few bones inside a black body shape.  As you can see, there really isn't any crossover once you get past them both being damn cute skeleton kitties.

skeleton cat
©Ladislao Loera

A day or two back, I received an e-mail from a good friend asking about a skeleton cat by Ladislao Loera (aka "Ladi" / Frenzy Art).  Ladi happens to be one of my favorite artists, so this was a great compliment.  At first glance, Ladi's skeleton cat and Skelekitty have more of a similar look and feel to each other since they are both articulated skeletons with a bright color scheme.  However, they are each recognizable as separate and distinct creations.  Skelekitty is modeled after the long-bodied 1950's kitties where Ladi's skeleton cat looks more like a traditional Día de los Muertos figurine (complete with Frida-esque unibrow!).


Dia de los Muertos cat by Patrick
Murillo, hanging in my art studio
Another skelefied critter Skelekitty has been compared to (and I take it as a HUGE compliment) is by my friend, artist Patrick Murillo (who is on a cruise ship heading toward Mexico with the Crafty Chica Cruise!).  I adore his stuff, having purchased several pieces.  I even have one of his skele-kitty paintings hanging in my art studio!  Again, by glancing at his paintings, it's clear that Patrick's kitties, doggies and skeletons are painted by Patrick while Skelekitty and the Skelecritters are instantly recognizable as "Skelekitty & Friends."

OK, so you get how this works with cartoon skeleton cats (and dogs) now.  What about other stuff?

Late 2012 Update:  Check out this real life example of outright stolen images where an artist reproduced images by two other artists, Jason Levasque (aka Stuntkid) and Marie Killen.  In this case, the original images were art photographs and the "copied" versions were paintings with not-insignificant imagination and talent, but the original work was used without permission or even reference to the original artists.  Although the copying artist swore the copies were homages, the online art community, his agent and his gallery would have none of it - he was drummed off social media and out of representation.


Brooke Van Gory Designs
"Hummingbird" changing set
DESIGN

One of my good friends and a fellow member of the Corporate Rejects team of artisans, Brooke of Brooke Van Gory Designs makes totes, diaper bags and baby accessories (wet bags, changing pads, etc.).  Anybody can sell diaper bags and a lot of handmade sellers do.  What makes Brooke's bags special, besides her incredible attention to detail and excellent construction, is her design.  The bags aren't cut from someone else's pattern - she drafts her own patterns, which are copyrightable.  All of her diaper bags are sewn from her original designs, so, unless she gives permission, no-one else is allowed to sell bags of the same size, shape and with the same features.  Therefore, she would have every right to claim infringement if someone were to make a bag identical to hers.

Are you all with me so far?


Brooke Van Gory Designs "Doodle
Skull" Expedient© diaper bag
Another 'element' that set Brooke's creations apart from most other sellers are the fabrics that she uses.  Most of them (with a few exceptions, like the hand-painted Rocky The Zombie collaboration bags) are constructed using commercially available fabrics with a bit of a 'punk rock mommy' feel to them.  There are LOTS of skulls (really, really cute skulls; and PINK!)!!  Now, while the fabric combinations that Brooke uses are definitely a part of her shop 'signature,' they are NOT something she can copyright.  Remember where we came in with the mere idea of a skeleton cat wasn't subject to copyright protection?  Yep.  We're right back there.


The simple IDEA of putting skulls on baby stuff cannot be and is not protected by copyright.  

It's not infringement, it's good old fashioned American competition!!  Besides, the fabrics are commercially available - heck, as long as I didn't swipe her bag designs, I could go back to sewing and make and sell a ton of baby stuff just swimming in skulls - even the same skull fabrics that Brooke uses.  She could threaten to sue me until she's blue in the face, but it wouldn't make a difference, legally speaking.  Don't worry though, I'm sticking to my painting and letting the seamstress extraordinaire do that thing she does so well.


TITLES

Here's another example of stuff you can't just threaten to sue people over:  I received an e-mail in mid-February from someone threatening me for using the title "Pyrography 101" on a video tutorial (just a little video of my wood burning techniques).  She claimed,

The name is the title of my book & registered domain. Please read the notice at the bottom of my website page regarding the use of the name Pyrography 101 and remove that title from your utube[sic] page. [link removed]
I will check back and if not removed withing the next 24 hours I will proceed with the next step of action to have it taken down and/or legal action.

Okayyyyyy......

Since this woman contacted me anonymously through one of my ArtFire listings, I had to do about 2 minutes of research to find her e-mail.  I responded immediately and told her that while she may indeed have a registered domain in that name, domain registration does not afford her copyright protection and since "101" is a term that has been in common usage for decades, it is not subject to copyright or trademark.  Furthermore, since I had never heard of her, any similarity between the techniques in my video and her book are coincidental or are common practices.  (I also suggested that if perhaps she had used a title that was a little more unique, she wouldn't have felt the need to send legally unsubstantiated threats to people who are providing simple tutorials.)  Just for fun (because I hate bullies), I also looked up YouTube's policies on intentionally mis-reporting copyright infringement and found that they don't like that much, so I told her that if she flagged my video as copyright infringement I would file a counter-claim and provide a copy of my e-mail to YouTube as proof that her claim was both frivolous and harassing.  I never heard from her again.

 UPDATE - April 24th, 2011:  It appears I spoke too soon since I received a comment from @nedraspryro on my YouTube video today (slightly over 24 hours by about 63 days).  It went something like this:
Interesting Pyrography 101 tutorial. A very simplistic outline & nothing more. What is funny is that at the end of your tutorial you state the images & burning are your own & not to steal it. Very funny coming from someone who has stolen the title of someone else's book & online tutorial series entitled "Pyrography 101" to make your own pyrography tutorial. Although titles are not protected by copyright law it is protected by other IP law & you should read the law before using it publicly
She's wrong on a few things here - actually, titles can be covered by copyright law, but not something that is in such common usage as "_______ 101."  She also accuses me of "stealing" her "online tutorial series" which, as I told her in my first response, I'd never seen.  However, I see no point in arguing with someone who's pretty clearly off their nut, so I just sent her a response stating,
I see you created a YouTube account for the express purpose of harassing me again.  Perhaps you forgot my very detailed message to you in February, therefore, it is once again attached below.

As promised, I have reported you to YouTube for harassment and for malicious mis-reporting copyright infringement. I actually have a background in intellectual property law, so perhaps it is YOU who should read the law before publicly and ignorantly accusing people of things which you do not understand fully.

Any further contact from you on this matter will result in additional action on my part, including, but not limited to, contacting publishers, suppliers, internet providers, etc. and advising them that you are harassing me.
And yes, I really did report her to YouTube. You can report anyone who is harassing you by bullying, posting hate speech/rude comments or making threats on YouTube via this link:  http://www.youtube.com/safety_help


*   ☠  *   ♥   *   ☠  *   ♥   *   ☠  *   ♥   *   ☠  *   ♥   *   ☠  *   ♥   *   ☠  *

I hope that this clears up some of the questions that I've been getting lately about what is and isn't copyright infringment and doesn't raise TOO MANY others.  Now feel free to go draw your own skelefied critter or make a baby blanket with skulls on it.  Nobody can stop you as long as you don't do anything naughty.

Oh yeah, and remember that I'm not a lawyer and this doesn't constitute legal advice, kthxbai.
Read more ...

Monday, October 18, 2010

FAQ: Can I Use That Image? (aka Copyright 101)

Intellectual property (patents, licenses, copyrights) is a pretty tough concept to get your mind around, but you are in luck.  As it happens, before I was a full time artist, I used to negotiate licensing agreements.  True story.  And since I received two almost identical inquiries involving this very subject in the last few months, I figured it warranted its own post.

In both cases, the requests boiled down to this:


they wanted to commission a piece of art from me and then sell reproductions of the image (one on jewelry, one as prints).


My short answer was "no" to both because, whether or not they purchase a physical painting from me, the image still belongs to me.  That's where the "intellectual" part of intellectual property comes in - the idea (and execution of that idea) is my property.  Yep.  No matter what they pay for the paintings themselves, such payment does not include the right to use the images.

Still a little confused?  No problem.

Think of it this way:  Let's say you go to Borders or your local book store (they still have those, right?) and you buy a copy of Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows.  You own that physical book, that thing with pages (the "tangible property") - you paid for it.  You may put it on the shelf or dog-ear the corners, sell it in a garage sale or even, God forbid, burn it if you want to.  However, you don't own the rights to the IDEAS contained therein.  You may not make copies of the book and sell them.  You may not make a movie of the book.... unless of course you have permission from Ms. Rowling (customarily in the form of a license agreement and huge-ass amounts of cash going from you to her).

Art works very much in the same way.  Let's say you pay me for a custom painting of your cat.  No matter how much I charge you for that painting - you are only paying for my time, supplies and creativity, not for the rights to use the image.  So even if I charge you an exorbitant amount, you still may not make copies, prints, Christmas cards (not even for your own use) unless we have a written agreement where I specifically give you those rights (which would be under a License Agreement).  Yeah, I know, even though it's YOUR cat.  Even if I painted from a photo you took.

2011 ADDENDUM:  The reverse/reciprocal is also true: I have the right to do whatever I want with the image.  As the artist, I may create prints, cards or another painting OR I may license the rights to someone else to make items using the image: rubber stamps, posters, car wraps, whatever.  The recipient of the original has no rights outside of the ownership of the tangible, physical property (painting) and may not dictate what the artist may or may not do with the image.  Even if it's a painting of YOUR cat.  Even if it was painted from your photo. 

Another intellectual property tidbit: you need to enforce your intellectual property rights or you lose them.  That's why the Disney Corporation protects Mickey so vehemently.  It's also why I do not ever make exceptions - not even for friends.  I mean, you all saw The Godfather, right?  "It's not personal, Sonny. It's strictly business." 

Anyway, I hope this helped to give you a very brief overview of intellectual property as it pertains to questions I get asked pretty often.   If you have more questions, let me know!

Krissi
Read more ...